Dene-Caucasian Hypothesis - Revision history

Ingmardb at 14:05, 21 August 2021

2021-08-21T14:05:01Z

2021-08-21T14:02:56Z

2021-08-21T14:01:08Z

2021-08-21T13:59:33Z

2021-08-21T13:58:35Z

2021-08-21T13:57:16Z

2021-08-21T13:54:49Z

2019-02-09T04:06:57Z

2019-02-09T04:06:34Z

2019-02-09T04:05:52Z

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <p margn-top:1-px;>
-It may be said here, that however interesting as it may have seemed at the time (before 2000), the Dene-Caucasian Hypothesis has become an implausible point of view in linguistic science. It has become even more implausible in the light of genetic research into the origin of the indigenous Tibetans, which has shown no genetic relationship between the Na-Dene and Tibetan peoples. We can find evidence of this in the article of Yaping Qian and others, "Multiple origins of Tibetan Y chromosomes", published in 2000. (DOI 10.1007/s004390000259) Moreover, the following chronological tables do not show any indication towards confirmation of the hypothesis.
+The following chronological tables do not show any indication towards confirmation of the hypothesis. It may be said here, that however interesting as it may have seemed at the time (before 2000), the Dene-Caucasian Hypothesis has become an implausible point of view in linguistic science. It has become even more implausible in the light of genetic research into the origin of the indigenous Tibetans, which has shown no genetic relationship between the Na-Dene and Tibetan peoples. We can find evidence of this in the article of Yaping Qian and others, "Multiple origins of Tibetan Y chromosomes", published in 2000. (DOI 10.1007/s004390000259)
 </p>
 <br>

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <p margn-top:1-px;>
-It may be said here, that however interesting as it may have seemed at the time (before 2000), the Dene-Caucasian Hypothesis has become an implausible point of view in linguistic science. It has become even more implausible in the light of genetic research into the origin of the indigenous Tibetans, which has shown no genetic relationship between the Na-Dene and Tibetan peoples. We can find evidence of this in the article of Yaping Qian and others, "Multiple origins of Tibetan Y chromosomes", published in 2000. (DOI 10.1007/s004390000259) Moreover, the following chronological tables do not show any positive clues in favour of the hypothesis.
+It may be said here, that however interesting as it may have seemed at the time (before 2000), the Dene-Caucasian Hypothesis has become an implausible point of view in linguistic science. It has become even more implausible in the light of genetic research into the origin of the indigenous Tibetans, which has shown no genetic relationship between the Na-Dene and Tibetan peoples. We can find evidence of this in the article of Yaping Qian and others, "Multiple origins of Tibetan Y chromosomes", published in 2000. (DOI 10.1007/s004390000259) Moreover, the following chronological tables do not show any indication towards confirmation of the hypothesis.
 </p>
 <br>

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <p margn-top:1-px;>
-It may be said here, that however interesting as it was at the time (before 2000), the Dene-Caucasian Hypothesis has become an implausible viewpoint in linguistic science. It has become even more implausible in the light of genetic research into the origin of the indigenous Tibetans, which has shown no genetic relationship between the Na-Dene and Tibetan peoples. We can find evidence of this in the article of Yaping Qian and others, "Multiple origins of Tibetan Y chromosomes", published in 2000. (DOI 10.1007/s004390000259) Moreover, the following chronological tables do not show any positive clues in favour of the hypothesis.
+It may be said here, that however interesting as it may have seemed at the time (before 2000), the Dene-Caucasian Hypothesis has become an implausible point of view in linguistic science. It has become even more implausible in the light of genetic research into the origin of the indigenous Tibetans, which has shown no genetic relationship between the Na-Dene and Tibetan peoples. We can find evidence of this in the article of Yaping Qian and others, "Multiple origins of Tibetan Y chromosomes", published in 2000. (DOI 10.1007/s004390000259) Moreover, the following chronological tables do not show any positive clues in favour of the hypothesis.
 </p>
 <br>

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <p margn-top:1-px;>
-It may be said here, that however interesting as it was at the time, the Dene-Caucasian Hypothesis has become an implausible viewpoint in linguistic science. It has become even more implausible in the light of genetic research into the origin of the indigenous Tibetans, which has shown no genetic relationship between the Na-Dene and Tibetan peoples. We can find evidence of this in the article of Yaping Qian and others, "Multiple origins of Tibetan Y chromosomes", published in 2000. (DOI 10.1007/s004390000259) Moreover, the following chronological tables do not show any positive clues in favour of the hypothesis.
+It may be said here, that however interesting as it was at the time (before 2000), the Dene-Caucasian Hypothesis has become an implausible viewpoint in linguistic science. It has become even more implausible in the light of genetic research into the origin of the indigenous Tibetans, which has shown no genetic relationship between the Na-Dene and Tibetan peoples. We can find evidence of this in the article of Yaping Qian and others, "Multiple origins of Tibetan Y chromosomes", published in 2000. (DOI 10.1007/s004390000259) Moreover, the following chronological tables do not show any positive clues in favour of the hypothesis.
 </p>
 <br>

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <p margn-top:1-px;>
-It may be said here, that however interesting as it was at the time, the Dene-Caucasian Hypothesis has become an implausible viewpoint in linguistic science. It has become even more implausible in the light of genetic research into the origin of the indigenous Tibetans, which has shown no genetic relationship between the Na-Dene and Tibetan peoples. We can find evidence of this in the article of Yaping Qian and others, "Multiple origins of Tibetan Y chromosomes", published in 2000. (DOI 10.1007/s004390000259) Moreover, the following chronological tables do not show any conspicuous clues as to the verification of the hypothesis.
+It may be said here, that however interesting as it was at the time, the Dene-Caucasian Hypothesis has become an implausible viewpoint in linguistic science. It has become even more implausible in the light of genetic research into the origin of the indigenous Tibetans, which has shown no genetic relationship between the Na-Dene and Tibetan peoples. We can find evidence of this in the article of Yaping Qian and others, "Multiple origins of Tibetan Y chromosomes", published in 2000. (DOI 10.1007/s004390000259) Moreover, the following chronological tables do not show any positive clues in favour of the hypothesis.
 </p>
 <br>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <html>
 <h3>Concise Timetable on the History of the Na-Dene and Sino-Tibetan Languages</h3>
 <TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="6" width="870" BGCOLOR="#EEEEEE" STYLE="border: 1px solid #b0b0b0;">

@@ Line 201: / Line 201: @@
 </TABLE>
-<br /><br />
+<br />
-<H3>Chronologie van de Na-Dene en Sino-Tibetaanse Talen</h3>  </html>  [[File:Dutch.gif]]<html>
+<H3>Chronologie van de Na-Dene en Sino-Tibetaanse Talen  </html>  [[File:Dutch.gif]]<html></h3>
 <br />