Authorship Attribution Method - Revision history

Ingmardb at 02:32, 15 February 2019

2019-02-15T02:32:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:32, 15 February 2019
Line 51:		Line 51:
	Indian Languages”, which is found on the		Indian Languages”, which is found on the
	World		World
	Wide Web at		Wide Web at <a href="http://gretil.sub.uni-goettingen.de" target="_blank">http://gretil.sub.uni-goettingen.de</a>
	The Unicode (UTF-8) encoded		The Unicode (UTF-8) encoded
	versions		versions

Ingmardb at 02:28, 15 February 2019

2019-02-15T02:28:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:28, 15 February 2019
Line 170:		Line 170:
	is needed.		is needed.
	Such		Such
	POS-taggers for Sanskrit are becoming ~~avaiblable in~~ the past few		POS-taggers for Sanskrit are slowly becoming more easily available over the past few
	years, but as it is they are not easily adaptable for use in this		years, but as it is at the moment, they are not easily adaptable for use in this
	particular investigation. Methods		particular investigation. Methods
	using word counts are not suitable,		using word counts are not suitable,

Ingmardb at 04:05, 14 February 2019

2019-02-14T04:05:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:05, 14 February 2019
Line 221:		Line 221:
	<p>		<p>
	In		In
	~~tis~~		this
	formula,		formula,
	x is an n-gram in profiles D<sub>		x is an n-gram in profiles D<sub>

Ingmardb at 04:01, 14 February 2019

2019-02-14T04:01:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:01, 14 February 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:
	</head>		</head>

	<div style="width: 70%; padding: 20px; background-color: ~~#f0f0f0~~; border: 1px solid #b0b0b0;">		<div style="width: 70%; padding: 20px; background-color: white; border: 1px solid #b0b0b0;">

	<h2 style="margin-top: 0px;">A		<h2 style="margin-top: 0px;">A

Ingmardb at 03:32, 14 February 2019

2019-02-14T03:32:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:32, 14 February 2019
Line 331:		Line 331:

	<p><br><i>Table		<p><br><i>Table
	4</i><br></p>		4</i><br><br></p>

	<p>Finally,		<p>Finally,

Ingmardb at 03:21, 14 February 2019

2019-02-14T03:21:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:21, 14 February 2019
Line 13:		Line 13:
	<p>		<p>
	<br>		<br>
	Ingmar de Boer • March 30, 2017 • v. 5 • [[Media:Ingmar_de_Boer_-_A_Statistical_Authorship_Attribution_Method_Applied_to_the_Buddhist_Scriptures_of_Ārya_Asaṅga_-_5.pdf ‎\| download this article in PDF]] [[File:Pdf3.gif]]		Ingmar de Boer • March 30, 2017 • v. 5 • </html>[[Media:Ingmar_de_Boer_-_A_Statistical_Authorship_Attribution_Method_Applied_to_the_Buddhist_Scriptures_of_Ārya_Asaṅga_-_5.pdf ‎\| download this article in PDF]] [[File:Pdf3.gif]] <html>
	<br><br>		<br><br>
	</p>		</p>

Ingmardb at 03:21, 14 February 2019

2019-02-14T03:21:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:21, 14 February 2019
Line 13:		Line 13:
	<p>		<p>
	<br>		<br>
	Ingmar de Boer • March 30, 2017 • v. 5 • download this article in PDF [[File:Pdf3.gif]]		Ingmar de Boer • March 30, 2017 • v. 5 • [[Media:Ingmar_de_Boer_-_A_Statistical_Authorship_Attribution_Method_Applied_to_the_Buddhist_Scriptures_of_Ārya_Asaṅga_-_5.pdf ‎\| download this article in PDF]] [[File:Pdf3.gif]]
	<br><br>		<br><br>
	</p>		</p>

Ingmardb at 03:20, 14 February 2019

2019-02-14T03:20:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:20, 14 February 2019
Line 13:		Line 13:
	<p>		<p>
	<br>		<br>
	Ingmar de Boer • March 30, 2017 • v. 5		Ingmar de Boer • March 30, 2017 • v. 5 • download this article in PDF [[File:Pdf3.gif]]
	<br><br>		<br><br>
	</p>		</p>

Ingmardb at 03:17, 14 February 2019

2019-02-14T03:17:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:17, 14 February 2019
Line 429:		Line 429:
	description, or		description, or
	we see Maitreyanātha		we see Maitreyanātha
	as a human author. ■</p>		as a human author.</p>


Line 442:		Line 442:
	SBh		SBh
	and BBh correspond to each other very closely, as might be expected,		and BBh correspond to each other very closely, as might be expected,
	both being part of the larger YBh.		both being part of the larger YBh. ■
	</p>		</p>

Ingmardb at 03:16, 14 February 2019

2019-02-14T03:16:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:16, 14 February 2019
Line 150:		Line 150:
	by		by
	an		an
	earlier study.<sup>		earlier study.<sup>1</sup>
	In his article on n-grams, Kešelj uses a simple procedure to		In his article on n-grams, Kešelj uses a simple procedure to
	calculate a distance between two profiles. Besides English and Middle		calculate a distance between two profiles. Besides English and Middle
Line 156:		Line 156:
	results were only slightly less accurate		results were only slightly less accurate
	than for the English texts.		than for the English texts.
	In a later trial this approach proved to be successful (Juola 2008).<sup>		In a later trial this approach proved to be successful (Juola 2008).<sup>2</sup>

	</p>		</p>
Line 209:		Line 209:
	(see appendix) for generating two profiles from two UTF-8 encoded		(see appendix) for generating two profiles from two UTF-8 encoded
	texts and calculating their distance following the description of		texts and calculating their distance following the description of
	Kešelj (2004).<sup>		Kešelj (2004).<sup>3</sup>
	I have adjusted the distance calculation so, that whenever an n-gram		I have adjusted the distance calculation so, that whenever an n-gram
	is present in only one of the profiles, no distance term is added.		is present in only one of the profiles, no distance term is added.
Line 408:		Line 408:
	ant		ant
	here to the extent to which a mythological character can or cannot be		here to the extent to which a mythological character can or cannot be
	considered the author of a text. ~~Ttha’s~~		considered the author of a text. Tāranātha’s
	description of the process of inspired writing suggests that Maitreya		description of the process of inspired writing suggests that Maitreya
	dictated the texts to ~~Asaga~~,		dictated the texts to Asaṅga,
	memorizing them literally, and not for many years later entrusted		memorizing them literally, and not for many years later entrusted
	them to the palmleaf. This way, Maitreya’s style of writing could		them to the palmleaf. This way, Maitreya’s style of writing could
	be different from ~~Asaga’s~~		be different from Asaṅga’s
	in		in
	an		an
Line 426:		Line 426:
	Vice versa, if we conclude from the separation of the two clusters,		Vice versa, if we conclude from the separation of the two clusters,
	that there are two different authors here, either we		that there are two different authors here, either we
	believe in a process of inspired writing as in ~~Ttha’s~~		believe in a process of inspired writing as in Tāranātha’s
	description, or		description, or
	we see Maitreyanātha		we see Maitreyanātha
	as a human author.</p>		as a human author. ■</p>